Legal Opinion
Taraska v. Carmel
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 27, 1998No. CIV-97-2561-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On December 12, 1997, Plaintiff Mike Tar-aska, a resident of California, commenced this diversity action against Michael W. Car-mel (“Carmel”) and his wife “Jane Doe” Car-mel, residents of Arizona, asserting one cause of action for defamation. Plaintiffs allegations are based on the following circumstances.
By letter dated October 29, 1997, Carmel, the Chapter 11 bankruptcy trustee of an adult entertainment business known as the Jungle Cabaret, wrote a letter to the Attorney Advisor of the United States Trustee for the District of Arizona in response to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Betty A. Linton, Also Known as Betty A. Lasiter, Debtor. Appeal of Betty A. Lasiter and Richard L. ScharpfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Kashani v. Fulton (In Re Kashani)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Schechter v. Illinois, Department of Revenue (In Re Markos Gurnee Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- White v. City of Santee (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muratore v. DarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Edwin A. Epstein, Jr. Operating Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- In Re FoorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2000
- Jerry Cox v. Mariposa CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020