Legal Opinion
United States v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided November 14, 1955No. Civ. No. 605PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILLIAM, District Judge.
This action is for reimbursement to the Railroad Retirement Board of sickness benefits paid to Mary Lou Mintz, a former employee of the defendant railroad.
In April, 1947, Miss Mintz was injured while at work, and under Section 2(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 352(a), the Board paid her sickness benefits during the period of her disability, in the total amount of $1,105.00.
Section 12(0) of the Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 362(0), provides that:
“Benefits payable to an employee with respect to days of sickness shall be payable regardless of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Standidge v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, and Cross-Appellant, and Mary Lou MintzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, and Cross-Appellant, and Mary Lou MintzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956