Legal Opinion

In re the alleged lunacy of Foran

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 29, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This matter was referred to James Buchanan, as advisory master, who filed the following conclusions: The brother of an alleged lunatic presents this petition to the chancellor under the supplement approved March 3d, 1915, and which took effect immediately (P. L. 1915 ¶. •57), stating, amongst other things, that the alleged lunatic is possessed of personal property consisting of about $-1,000, deposited to his credit with a trust company, and praying the chancellor to…

Read the full summary

This matter was referred to James Buchanan, as advisory master, who filed the following conclusions: The brother of an alleged lunatic presents this petition to the chancellor under the supplement approved March 3d, 1915, and which took effect immediately (P. L. 1915 ¶. •57), stating, amongst other things, that the alleged lunatic is possessed of personal property consisting of about $-1,000, deposited to his credit with a trust company, and praying the chancellor to ascertain the truth of the allegations of the petition, and to appoint a guardian of the alleged lunatic. By the second section…

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

An order will be made in conformity with the advice contained in the conclusions of Advisory Master Buchanan, which are hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re OswaldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Borden v. Wolf Silk Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  3. In Re EdmonstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  4. In Re Collins-Doan Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Morten v. CollinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API