Legal Opinion

Gutshall v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 4862Published

Appeal from the District Court of Montrose County. Don. Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by S. P. Grutshall against L. Gr. Carpenter as State Engineer, District No. 4, and W. O. Her sum, Water Commissioner, District No. 41. From a judg-. ment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Decision en banc.

1Per curiam

-The questions presented by this appeal have been settled by the previous decisions of this court in Irrigation Co. v. Water S. & S. Co., 29 Colo. 469; Fluke v. Ford, 35 Colo. 112; New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Arthur Irrigation Co., ante, page 530; Ashenfelter v. Carpenter, ante, page 534.

The judgment of tbe district court is in accordance with the views expressed in these cases, and will, therefore, be affirmed, without prejudice to appellant to maintain a proceeding in accordance with the act of 1899 (Sess. Laws 1899, 235) and the act of 1903 (Sess. Laws 1903, 278).

Decision en…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Fluke v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API