Legal Opinion

Bloodgood v. Grasey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Mobile. Tried before the Hon. Alex. McKiNStrt. This was a petition for freedom, under section 2049 of the Code, by Grasey and her children, who are described in the proceedings as “persons of African descent,” against Hildreth Bloodgood and his wife, who claimed them as slaves.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the City Court of Mobile. Tried before the Hon. Alex. McKiNStrt. This was a petition for freedom, under section 2049 of the Code, by Grasey and her children, who are described in the proceedings as “persons of African descent,” against Hildreth Bloodgood and his wife, who claimed them as slaves. The petitioners claimed their freedom under a deed of manumission from Josias ~W. Dallam to the maternal grandmother of Grasey, with other slaves ; which was executed in Maryland, and of which the following is a copy: “ To all whom these presents shall come, Greeting : I, Josias "W.…

1Opinion of the CourtWaleek, J.

— The appellees claim freedom under a .deed of manumission, made in. the State of Maryland, in 1787. The deed attempts to provide a prospective emancipation, and is attested by only one witness. The law of Maryland, authorizing such emancipation, was a statute adopted in 1752, which was given in evidence. It is a. question in this ease, whether that act requires the attestation of two subscribing witnesses to a deed of prospective emancipation, or whether that requisition is confined to deeds, the operation of which is contemporaneous-with their delivery. The decision of this question depends…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Shelby v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Green v. Lessee of NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Varner v. Young'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Wilson's Adm'r v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API