Legal Opinion

Pring v. Thorp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 24th day of November, 1914, directing the plaintiff to serve a biff of particulars.

1Per curiam

The action is for damages for slander alleged to have been uttered by defendant “during the months of August, September and October, 1912, * * * in the presence and hearing of divers persons.’’ The order appealed from requires plaintiff to furnish particulars, (a) of each and all of the times and places during the months named when plaintiff claims and expects to prove that the slanderous words were uttered, and (b) the names of the persons in whose presence and hearing the plaintiff claims and expects to prove such utterances. As to the second item it will be sufficient if plaintiff is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rowe v. WashburneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yerkey v. WrightSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
  2. Pring v. ThorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Taub v. Credit Clearing HouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API