Legal Opinion

Ellentuck v. Klein

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 4, 1978No. 69, Docket 77-7209Published

1Concurrence · LumbardLumbard, Circuit Judge

I concur in the affirmance of the order dismissing the complaint and join in Judge Moore’s reasoning with respect to plaintiffs’ third and fourth causes of action under § 1983. I believe, however, that the first and second causes of action ought to be dismissed for reasons other than those relied on by Judge Moore.

I

Part V of Judge Moore’s opinion holds that the second and third causes of action in the Ellentuck complaint are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, as well as by comity. I do not agree that res judicata or collateral estoppel principles are applicable to those counts on…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Feinberg.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Comparato v. KnaufNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Anderson v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API