Ellentuck v. Klein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Concurrence · LumbardLumbard, Circuit Judge
I concur in the affirmance of the order dismissing the complaint and join in Judge Moore’s reasoning with respect to plaintiffs’ third and fourth causes of action under § 1983. I believe, however, that the first and second causes of action ought to be dismissed for reasons other than those relied on by Judge Moore.
I
Part V of Judge Moore’s opinion holds that the second and third causes of action in the Ellentuck complaint are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, as well as by comity. I do not agree that res judicata or collateral estoppel principles are applicable to those counts on…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Feinberg.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Comparato v. KnaufNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Anderson v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1974