Legal Opinion

CONESTOGA PINES HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N, INC. v. Black

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1984No. 83CA0764PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

Defendants, Frank and Carolyn Black, appeal from a judgment for a permanent injunction prohibiting them from keeping goats on their residential property in the Conestoga Pines South Subdivision. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Conestoga Pines Homeowner’s Association, Inc., is a non-profit corporation whose voluntary members are homeowners in two adjacent subdivisions. The Association brought suit against defendants alleging that they were keeping goats, in violation of a restrictive covenant of the south subdivision.

I

On appeal, defendants first contend that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Jameson v. FosterColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Rooney v. Peoples Bank of Arapahoe CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Club Valencia Homeowners Ass'n v. Valencia AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Buffalo Park Development Co. v. Mountain Mutual Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Colorado Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Pueblo CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API