Legal Opinion

Whiting and Farris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 2, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.

Information was filed against plaintiffs in error charging Young Farris as principal in the commission of an armed robbery, and Joe Whiting with participation therein as accessory before the fact. A third person, William Weaver, pleaded guilty to a further information charging him as a principal in the same robbery. Upon trial, Farris and Whiting were found guilty as charged. Upon this writ of error, reversal is urged as to Whiting, the sole ground relied on therefor being the asserted insufficiency of the evidence as to him.

The robbery in question oceured just after dark on the evening of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  2. M'Rae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Buie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Victor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Forrest Lake v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. In Re: Livvie W. VannSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API