Legal Opinion

Wofford v. Tinney

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1953No. 34550Published

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The defendant contends that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiff’s own negligence was the proximate cause of the collision and for this reason the court properly sustained the general demurrer and dismissed the action. We do not agree with him. The petition does not allege facts showing any specific acts of negligence on the plaintiff’s part or that the plaintiff in the exercise of ordinary care could have discovered the defendant’s negligence and could have avoided the consequences thereof, and it is not necessary for the plaintiff to negative his negligence. Bach v. Bragg Bros.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bach v. Bragg Bros. & Blackwell Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Callaghan v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API