Legal Opinion

Cerrato v. Santugge

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court,. Borough of the Bronx, Second District. Action by Michele Cerrato against James Santugge. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of the newly discovered evidence of one Bova. A perusal of the affidavits in support of the motion, *616which are practically uncontradicted in their essential features, seems to indicate that defendant has not been guilty of undue delay in obtaining the newly discovered evidence, which appears to be of a substantial nature, bearing upon the issues in suit in a manner that justifies a belief that, had such evidence been submitted at the trial, the result might have been different.

The main objection is that no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  3. James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Supreme Lodge K. P. v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API