Legal Opinion

Durham v. Rural/Metro Corporation

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 30, 2020No. 4:16-cv-01604Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION KIMBERLIE MICHELLE ) DURHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No.: 4:16-CV-01604-ACA ) RURAL/METRO ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Defendant Rural/Metro Corporation’s (“Rural/Metro”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 40). Plaintiff Kimberlie Durham contends that Rural/Metro violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)(1), 2000e(k), when it declined to offer her an accommodation for her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Hamilton v. Southland Christian School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Rollen Jackson v. State of Alabama State TenureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API