Mitzner v. Mitzner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*484The Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendant temporary exclusive possession of the marital residence given the domestic strife caused by the plaintiffs presence in the home and the fact that he had voluntarily established an alternative residence (see, Annexstein v Annexstein, 202 AD2d 1062; Kristiansen v Kristiansen, 144 AD2d 441, 442; Wolfe v Wolfe, 111 AD2d 809, 810).
It was not an improvident exercise of discretion to award the defendant interim counsel fees without a showing of need (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879; Anonymous v Anonymous, 213 AD2d 183). The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Roach v. RoachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fields v. CasseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kristiansen v. KristiansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kesten v. KestenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Pascazi v. PascaziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Susskind v. SusskindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Twaite v. TwaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Taub v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.