Legal Opinion

Childs v. Childs

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motioh by the defendant for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

I think there is no doubt that the facts alleged in the complaint would give the Surrogate’s Court jurisdiction to remove the trustee, and that that court would have power to give the plaintiff all the relief demanded in his complaint and all the relief to which the complaint shows him to be entitled. If the decrees made by the Surrogate’s Court on the former accountings stand in the plaintiff’s way they would do so equally in an action in this court as in a proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court. Code Civ. Pro., § 2813; Bowditch v. Ayrault, 138 N. Y. 222, 231; Matter of Elting, 93 App. Div.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowditch v. . AyraultNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Clark v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. In re of the Accounts of EltingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Mildeberger v. FranklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulkins v. SnowNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Childs v. ChildsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Mildeberger v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API