Legal Opinion

Estate of Samuel Segel, Deceased, Margaret D. Segel, and Margaret D. Segel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 20, 1966No. 30387_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This is a petition to review a decision of the United States Tax Court, Irene F. Scott, Judge, which held that the proceeds from the sales of two tracts of land were ordinary income, not capital gains. The question for determination is whether the court’s finding that petitioner * held the tracts “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business” under § 1221(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 is “clearly erroneous.” See Yara Engineering Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 344 F.2d 113 (3d Cir. 1965). We hold that it is not and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Howard W. Gault and Georgiana R. Gault v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Yara Engineering Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Jarret v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API