Legal Opinion

Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Duplissey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 13, 1911No. 18,532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; B. H. Pavy, Judge. Action by the Crowell & Spencer Lumber Company, Limited, against Samuel Duplissey. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

This was a possessory action.

Plaintiff sets out in its petition that it is the owner, and in possession since a number of years, of the S. W. % of section 31, township 1, and range 1 E., and that its possession has been disturbed by Samuel Duplissey, who, within the 12 months preceding the filing of its petition, has taken possession and has thereby committed a trespass; that defendant in thus disturbing its possession was influenced by malice; that, notwithstanding the amicable demand, by its officers and agents, of the defendant not to thus trespass upon its rights, the defendant continued…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Louisiana State Rice Milling Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API