Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bennette

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 16, 2011No. 11-6581Published

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Michael Wayne Moore appeals the district court’s judgment granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them and has moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. See Moore v. Bennette, 777 F.Supp.2d 969 (E.D.N.C.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. BennettDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API