Whitefort v. Homochitto Lumber Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
The appellant owned the Northeast quarter of section 24, township 4, range 3 East, and the appellee owned tim*22ber and. lands adjacent to this land lying both to the north, east, and south of said land, but does not own the timber or any right of way oyer the Northeast quarter of Southwest quarter,, section 24, township 4, range 3. The appellee desired to construct a logging road over the land of the appellant, and applied to her agent on the land for permission so to do. This agent informed the appellee that he had no right to grant him such right of way, but stated that, while he could not…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hooks v. George CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Quinn v. HollyMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Roberts v. PrassenosMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Rotenberry v. RenfroMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Ganier v. MansourCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.