Legal Opinion

Darling v. United Benefit Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 34,991Published

1Opinion of the Court

*76The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Appellee was the beneficiary under a life insurance policy which had been reinstated after having lapsed for nonpayment of a premium. Upon the death of the insured the company refused payment on the ground of material misrepresentation by the insured in his application for reinstatement. Action to enforce payment -was brought, the plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant company appeals.

The question here is whether there was substantial, competent evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the insured acted in good faith in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Sharrer v. Capitol Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Day v. National Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Jackson v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API