Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Matthews

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1896No. Nos. 608 and 612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Hearing on appeals from a decree in a suit in equity for the construction of a will. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alvey

The bill and cross bill filed in this case seek to obtain a judicial construction of the last will and testament of William E. Matthews, deceased. The will bears date the 12th of July, 1889, and Matthews, the testator, died on the 2d of May, 1894, and the will was admitted to probate on the 8th of March, 1895. The testator left surviving him a widow and one child, both being parties to these proceedings. By said will James T. Bradford and Howard H. Williams are made executors thereof, and are complainants in the original bill, and are two of the defendants in the cross bill. The cross bill is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Carroll v. Lessee of CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Joseph Wilkins v. David AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Smith and Others v. EdringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  5. Bradford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API