Legal Opinion

Little Store, Inc. v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1982No. 999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The appellant, Little Store, Inc., a corporation, was found guilty by a Baltimore City jury, presided over by Judge Alan M. Resnick, of distributing an obscene publication. It was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000. Upon this appeal, the appellant raises two contentions:

1. That Judge Resnick erroneously instructed and failed to instruct the jury in that:(a) He refused to give certain instructions requested by the appellant;(b) He erroneously provided two alternative definitions of the phrase "prurient interest”;(c) He erroneously defined the word "obscene”; and

2. That he erroneously failed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little Store, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API