Little Store, Inc. v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
The appellant, Little Store, Inc., a corporation, was found guilty by a Baltimore City jury, presided over by Judge Alan M. Resnick, of distributing an obscene publication. It was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000. Upon this appeal, the appellant raises two contentions:
1. That Judge Resnick erroneously instructed and failed to instruct the jury in that:(a) He refused to give certain instructions requested by the appellant;(b) He erroneously provided two alternative definitions of the phrase "prurient interest”;(c) He erroneously defined the word "obscene”; and
2. That he erroneously failed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Little Store, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983