Legal Opinion
Ken Petroleum Corp. v. Questor Drilling Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 6, 1998No. 13-97-014-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Justice.
Appellants Ken Petroleum Corporation (KEN) and Certain Member Companies at the Institute of London Underwriters (Underwriters), brought suit against Questor Drilling Corporation (Questor) and its parent company, Phibro Energy USA, Inc. (Phibro), for breach of the defense and indemnity provisions in a drilling contract. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Que-stor without stating the grounds for its decision. Appellants bring five points of error contending the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because: (1) the drilling contract was valid…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whalen v. Condominium Consulting & Management Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Ranger Insurance Co. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Ken Petroleum Corporation v. Questor Drilling Corp. and Phibro Energy USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Ralph Fletcher and D'Ann Fletcher v. John R. Edwards, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Ranger Insurance Company and Swift Energy Company v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Flournoy Production Company, and Flournoy Drilling Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002