Legal Opinion

Washam v. Beaty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 1923No. 5 Div. 825PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment brought by the appellee, as i>urchaser of a piece of land conveyed to him by Washam, deceased, and under whom the defendants claim title and that the conveyance to the plaintiff was invalid for the reason that the grantor was a married man, the land was his homestead, and, while the wife executed and acknowledged the deed in conformity with the statute, she was at the time insane and not legally responsible. In the case of Beaty v. Washam, 205 Ala. 92, 87 South. 337, this court held that, if the wife was insane at the time she executed the deed conveying the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dominick v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Pritchard v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Williamson v. Mayer Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Green v. Southern States Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Hughes v. BullenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. BrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Burden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. Campbell v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Lovell v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API