Legal Opinion
State v. Wiplinger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1984No. C9-82-1507Published
1Opinion of the Court
343 N.W.2d 858 (1984)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Richard Dean WIPLINGER, Appellant.
No. C9-82-1507.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
February 17, 1984.
Douglas W. Thomson, Thomson & Hawkins, St. Paul, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Richard D. Hodsdon, Beverly Jones Heydinger, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., St. Paul, Stephen C. Rathke, Crow Wing County Atty., Brainerd, for respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of kidnapping and criminal sexual conduct in the first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.