Legal Opinion

Wells v. College

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1992PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the denial of plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Judge Smith taking no part.

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Daniel Goldreyer, Ltd. v. Van De WeteringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Tambasco v. Norton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Sirohi v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Potter v. Jay E. Potter Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Katz v. United Synagogue of Conservative JudaismAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API