Legal Opinion
Ciolino v. Seterus, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 16, 2016No. Case No. 15 C 9247PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:
Patrick Ciolino claims that his mortgage servicer, Seterus, Inc., was required to terminate his private mortgage insurance by a specific date but did not do so. He has sued Seterus for violation of the Homeowners Protection Act (HPA or the Act), 12 U.S.C. §§ 4902-4904 (count one of the complaint), breach of contract (count two), and violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFA), 815 ILCS 505 (count three). Seterus asserts that the HPA preempts Ciolino’s breach of contract and ICFA claims and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matthew Dwoskin v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Abruscato v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., d/b/a Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022