Betz v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harvey District Court. Action by Maxwell against Betz to recover for rent. Judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here. The-opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On November 9, 1887, C. A. Betz, with the assent of W. S. Maxwell, the owner of the premises, took possession of a store building on lot 4, block 39, in the city of Newton, as a tenant at will. The rent was to be $50 a month. On November 23, 1887, Betz began to remove his property from the leased premises, and on that day Maxwell brought an action against him to recover $624, which he claimed as rent for the building for one year, from-October 1,. 1887, to October 1, 1888. At the commencement of that action, Maxwell filed an affidavit for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barlow v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Woodrow v. MichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Rollins v. MoodySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1881
- Batchelder v. BatchelderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1861
- Cornellison v. CornellisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McAllister v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930