Legal Opinion

Sabb v. Richardson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 1923No. 11185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of Hon. John S. Wilson, Circuit Judge, dissolving an attachment upon the ground that the moving papers did not contain an allegation of facts and circumstances from which the alleged fraudulent intention on the part of the defendant could reasonably be inferred.

The attachment was issued upon the verified complaint, which was permissible under Ferst v. Powers, 58 S. C., 398; 36 S. E., 744. The allegations of the complaint relied upon to sustain the attachment are: (1) That the defendant is about…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. M. Ferst's Sons & Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. Sharp v. PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  4. Roddey v. ErwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  5. The J.W. Copeland Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Munn v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Kania v. Atlas Wire Cable Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API