Malberg v. Cashen

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MARTIN MALBERG, Case No. 22-cv-01788-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING “NOTICE OF 9 v. CONFLICT” 10 ROBERT CASHEN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Martin Malberg’s “Notice of Conflict,” which the Court 14 construes as a motion for recusal. Mot., ECF No. 68. Plaintiff’s motion attaches a declaration 15 stating the basis for Plaintiff’s request. Id. at 2-3. For the reasons stated below, the Court 16 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 17 Plaintiff’s motion for recusal is governed by

28…