Legal Opinion

Old Town Tree Farm, Inc. v. Long Island Power Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

A party claiming entitlement to an easement by prescription must demonstrate the adverse, open and notorious, and continuous use of the subject property for the prescriptive period (see Vitiello v Merwin, 87 AD3d 632, 633 [2011]; Manouselis v Woodworth Realty, LLC, 83 AD3d 801 [2011]). “Absolute necessity in fact is the standard for a finding of an easement by necessity” (Michalski v Decker, 16 AD3d 469, 470 [2005]; see Town of Pound Ridge v Golenbock, 264 AD2d 773, 774 [1999]; Van Schaack v Torsoe, 161 AD2d 701, 703 [1990]; McQuinn v Tantalo, 41 AD2d 575 [1973]).

Here, the defendants failed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Almeida v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. McQuinn v. TantaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Vitiello v. MerwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Astwood v. BachinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API