Legal Opinion

Lisman v. Michigan Peninsular Car Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The Michigan Peninsular Oar Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of December, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial before the court without a jury at the New York Trial Term, a jury having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J.:

This action was brought to recover upon fifty-eight coupons maturing September 1,1899, and which, when issued, were attached . to certain bonds of the defendant. Payment of the bonds and coupons was secured by a mortgage upon certain franchises and property of the defendant, executed by it to the New York Guaranty and Indemnity Company, as trustee.

The plaintiff had a judgment for the full amount claimed in the complaint, from which the defendant has appealed.

At the trial there was little or no dispute as to the facts. It there appeared that the plaintiff was the owner of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Union-Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arthur v. BurkichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Dugan v. GrzybowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. American S. S. Co. v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
  4. Harnickell v. Omaha Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Silver v. Park-Lex Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API