Bland v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Bland appeals his conviction of a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, selling cocaine. The sole enumeration of error complains of the admission into evidence, for purposes of impeachment, of a prior conviction of defendant for possession of cocaine. Held:
On direct examination defendant was relating his contacts with an undercover agent when he testified as to stating to a third party that “I don’t fool with no crack cocaine.” On cross-examination defendant repeatedly testified, in the absence of any objection, as to stating to a third party…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Seabrooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Jester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Patten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005