Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1991No. A90A2085PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Bland appeals his conviction of a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, selling cocaine. The sole enumeration of error complains of the admission into evidence, for purposes of impeachment, of a prior conviction of defendant for possession of cocaine. Held:

On direct examination defendant was relating his contacts with an undercover agent when he testified as to stating to a third party that “I don’t fool with no crack cocaine.” On cross-examination defendant repeatedly testified, in the absence of any objection, as to stating to a third party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Seabrooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Jester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Patten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API