Legal Opinion

Smith v. Reidy

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 9, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On bill, &c. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, V. C.

Complainants, as vendors, file their bill for specific performs anee of a contract of sale to defendant of a certain lot located at or near Elizabeth, New Jersey. The contract was duly acknowledged by the complainant wife, as required by the statute. Deed has been tendered and refused.

The mitten agreement provided that complainants should convey free of all encumbrances. The complainant husband acquired title to the lot in question (which is part of a large real estate development tract) from the El Mora Land Company by bargain and sale deed without covenants or recital of any…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Javna v. DJ Fredricks, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Bank of Montclair v. MallasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Hoffman v. PerkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API