Legal Opinion
Tesch v. Stroud
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 31, 2000No. 13-99-318-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellant, Cheryl Tesch, appeals the dismissal of her medical malpractice action against appellee, David W. Stroud, M.D. In two issues, appellant contends the trial court erred by: (1) dismissing her cause of action, and (2) denying her motion for new trial. We affirm.
A. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The 24-year-old appellant filed a medical malpractice action against appellee on May 18, 1998, alleging that appellee’s negligent performance of pelvic surgery left her incontinent. The Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (“the Act”), found in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Horsley-Layman v. Angeles, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Whitworth v. Blumenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Rittenhouse v. Sabine Valley Center Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Olveda v. Sepulveda, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Marine Transport Corp. v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Hall v. Mieler, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.