Legal Opinion

Rabinowitz v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 5th day of February, 1909, denying a motion to vacate an order.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff having failed to show that the property is inadequate security for the amount due upon the bond and mortgage was not entitled to have a receiver of the property appointed. The order should he reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order appointing a receiver granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave, however, to the plaintiff to renew the application in case the defendant should unreasonably defend the action. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. I. M. Corp. v. CipuloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Eastbank, N. A. v. Malneut Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Sussman v. Lakesite Hotel Corp., New York County Courts1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API