Toplitz v. Ullman
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Sampson Toplitz against Leopold Ullman to recover damages for being wrongfully discharged from the service of defendant, upon a contract of employment for one year. From a judgment of the general term of the city court, affirming a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.
After the plaintiff was wrongfully discharged from the defendant’s service he endeavored to procure other employment, but was unsuccessful, and thereupon he embarked in business upon his own account in partnership with another. His share of the profits of the copartnership dur*864ing the stipulated period of service under his contract with the defendant was. $200. This sum, under the instruction of the court, was allowed by the jury as a deduction fiom the amount of the agreed wages which the plaintiff was prevented, by his discharge, from earning in the defendant’s service. Tho defendant claims…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Huntington v. Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bassett v. FrenchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Nuckolls v. College of Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Richardson v. HartmannNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Passino v. Brady Brass Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.