Legal Opinion

United States v. Andre E. Riggs

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 3, 2005No. 03-4017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This court previously reversed the district court’s grant of a downward departure to Andre Riggs based on his diminished mental capacity under § 5K2.13 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Riggs, 370 F.3d 382 (4th Cir.2004). We held that Riggs was ineligible for the downward departure because the facts and circumstances of his offense indicated a need to protect the public and involved a serious threat of violence under § 5K2.13(2). Id. at 386-87. We vacated his sentence and remanded the case for resentencing. Id. at 387. Judge Duncan dissented. Id. at 387-92. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Andre E. RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  4. Riggs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Hunter LoosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API