Legal Opinion

Moscoso v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2004No. 02-71324Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed April 2, 2004, is hereby withdrawn and replaced by the disposition filed concurrently with this order.

The stay of mandate ordered April 8, 2004, is hereby lifted.

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA or Board) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we recite them only as necessary to explain our decision.

1. We have rejected the contention that the Affirmance Without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Tilahun Fantaye Desta v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Mohinder Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Gloria Maribel Carrillo-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Douglas Cardenas Elizabeth Napa Douglas Omar Cardenas Sharon Cardenas Cheryl Cardenas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API