Holme v. . Stewart
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 21, 1898, affirming two orders of the Special Term, the first of which required the appellant to complete a purchase he made at a foreclosure sale of the defendant Stewart’s property by direction of and on behalf of the defendant; the second of which denied the appellant’s motion, on notice to the plaintiff and defendant to substitute the defendant in…
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 21, 1898, affirming two orders of the Special Term, the first of which required the appellant to complete a purchase he made at a foreclosure sale of the defendant Stewart’s property by direction of and on behalf of the defendant; the second of which denied the appellant’s motion, on notice to the plaintiff and defendant to substitute the defendant in appellant’s place as purchaser, or to have a resale of the property ordered on terms, or that appellant be permitted to assign…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., Gray and Martin, JJ., who dissent on the ground the question is not re viewable in this court.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Merges v. . RinglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Parish v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Conlon v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910