Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2007No. ED 87627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

James Hamilton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Appellant of forcible rape, forcible sodomy and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err. State v. Bourrage, 175 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BourrageMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Hamilton v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  3. Watkins v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API