State v. Hamilton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
James Hamilton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Appellant of forcible rape, forcible sodomy and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err. State v. Bourrage, 175 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BourrageMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
4Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hamilton v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Watkins v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007