Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 12, 1967No. 21581PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and defendants in error were defendants there. They will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court or by name.

The plaintiffs brought an action contending that by reason of defendants’ negligence a wheat crop owned by the plaintiffs was destroyed by fire, to their damage in the amount of $16,859. A directed verdict was granted for defendants by the trial judge at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. Plaintiffs are here on writ of error. On this posture of the case, we are required to examine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nettrour v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Maloney v. JusselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. City of Grand Junction v. LashmettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Zimmerman v. FranzenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Kendall v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banyai v. ArrudaColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Oil Building Corporation v. HermannColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Minto v. SpragueColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Nutting v. Northern Energy, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Vititoe v. Rocky Mountain Pavement Maint., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API