Legal Opinion

Tenney v. Cowles

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Drnie County. Action for a breach of warranty. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. There was a verdict for the defendant; a motion for a new trial was denied; and from the judgment entered on the verdict the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtOeton, J.

The appellant alleges substantially, in his complaint, that in the negotiation for the purchase (and which resulted in the purchase) of a stock of crockery and a lot of store fixtures in gross, the respondent warranted that said stock of goods then on hand, which he desired to sell, together with the fixtures (the cost of the latter being fixed at $300) had cost .him, or those from whom he purchased, from $3,500 to $4,000; that the cost marks on said goods *595would so show upon inventory-of said goods, and that he would guarantee the same to inventory at such cost at $3,500; and that he, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. NickersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. StellohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cole v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API