Legal Opinion

Clark Milling Co. v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1923No. 3451PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. Parties who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the court below are necessary defendants to a bill of exceptions brought by a losing party to reverse such judgment; and where some of such parties have not been served with the bill of exceptions, and have not acknowledged or waived service, the bill of exceptions, upon motion, must be dismissed. Humphrey v. Powell, 145 Ga. 458 (89 S. E. 427); Ray v. Hardman, 146 Ga. 718 (92 S. E. 211); Woolard v. Corcoran, 148 Ga. 299 (96 S. E. 564).

2. Where certain creditors of the intestate answered the petition of the administrator to marshal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Macon & Birmingham Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Ray v. HardmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Humphrey v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Woolard v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tillman v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Liner v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Webb & Martin Inc. v. Anderson-Mcgriff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Continental Trust Co. v. Sabine Basket Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Grand Chapter Order Eastern Star v. WolfeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API