Legal Opinion

State v. Gutierrez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2014No. Docket 33,296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIELS, Justice.

{1} This case involves factually related issues of the boundaries between proper and improper prosecutorial conduct in dealing with recalcitrant witnesses and of the circumstances in which a mistrial and retrial may take place without violating constitutional double jeopardy protections when a witness does not appear for trial. Following federal double jeopardy principles in United States Supreme Court precedent, we conclude that a prosecution witness’s failure to appear for Defendant’s trial did not constitute manifest necessity for granting a mistrial after a jury…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. VanderdussenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. StephensonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API