Kelly v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are-stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On the twenty-seventh day of December, 1881, plaintiff was in the employ of the Detroit Car Wheel Company, whose shops are situated near to the western limits of Detroit, and adjoining the railroad tracks of defendant. 'There are not less than six railroad tracks between the Oar Wheel Company’s shops and the depot of the defendant company in the city, and at some points a great many more. There are manufacturing institutions located along defendant’s right of way on either side, and spur tracks leading •thereto, all making up the necessary terminal, transfer, and local yard of the defendant…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fish v. Grand Trunk Western RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Dickson v. Chattanooga Ry. & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Fehnrich ex rel. Fehnrich v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SchwindtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.