Hix v. Boston Scientific Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jamie Hix, et al., No. CV-19-00422-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Boston Scientific Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“Boston Scientific”) 16 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 19). Plaintiffs Ms. Jamie 17 Hix (“Ms. Hix”) and Mr. Byron Hix (“Mr. Hix”) filed a Response (Doc. 22) and Boston 18 Scientific filed a Reply. (Doc. 23). 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Ms. Hix suffered from stress urinary incontinence. (Doc. 16 ¶37). To…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.