Legal Opinion
Paul v. Sherburne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 2006No. 2005-326PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The plaintiff, Ric Paul, appeals a decision of the Milford District Court (Crocker, J.) dismissing his small claim action for malicious prosecution against the defendant, Franklin C. Sherburne. We reverse and ■ remand.
The undisputed facts are as follows. In early February 2002, Sherburne brought a civil stalking petition against Paul in the Rochester District" Court. See RSA 633:3-a, III-a (Supp. 2005). The District Court (Jones, J.) promptly issued an ex parte temporary order of protection against Paul. See id:, RSA 173-B:4,1 (2002). A final hearing on the merits was scheduled to be held on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ERG, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- H. P. Rieger & Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Robinson v. Fimbel Door Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Stock v. ByersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Daniels v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ojo v. LorenzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Farm Family Casualty Insurance v. Town of RollinsfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Gidley v. OliveriDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.