Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Felt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 30, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

The defendant, Richard Felt, is the subject of a petition for commitment under G. L. c. 123A, § 12. A judge in the Superior Court allowed a motion for the defendant’s counsel to be present during interviews conducted by qualified examin*317ers pursuant to G. L. c. 123A, § 13 (a) (§ 13 [a]).1 One of the two qualified examiners refused to conduct the interview with counsel in the room and submitted to the court her qualified examiner report based on her review of the defendant’s records only. The questions we consider in this case are whether the “examination” that a qualified examiner must…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Insurance Rating Board v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. WAYNE W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. DubeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George MacKie v. Katrin Rouse-Weir / George MacKie v. Robert JossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API