Legal Opinion
People v. Mulqueen
Nassau County District Court
Decided September 10, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*633OPINION OF THE COURT
M. Arthur Eiberson, J.
The defendant moves for an order pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) setting aside the verdict returned against him by the jury, which acquitted him of two counts of aggravated harassment in violation of Penal Law § 240.30, but found him guilty of the violation of section 40-c (2) of the Civil Rights Law as charged in the third count of the information. The defendant argues, first, that the jury’s verdict of guilty was against the weight of the evidence, second, that the conviction under Civil Rights Law § 40-c (2) was in violation of defendant’s First…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TalleyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. Joshua H.California Court of Appeal · 1993