Legal Opinion

Woody v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1970No. 43310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

This appeal presents the sole question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the allegation of “breaking” in the burglary indictment.

A storage house in the city of Amarillo owned by Carl Coffee was broken into in the early evening hours of July 31, 1968, by a person or persons unknown. Entry was obtained through a door which was “damaged slightly.” Amarillo city policeman Harold Mann and a fellow officer made an investigation that evening and before leaving “shut the door as best we could,” meaning “that we pulled it to.” Explaining there was no latch on the door…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Leaderbrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Mixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Warden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API